Part -2
»
2.3 june2006
(
>> )
rluitel - 07 Jun 2006, 08:10 am
wow !! it's was rocking !!! :lol: :lol:
Scruffy - 07 Jun 2006, 12:13 pm
Exactly what was rocking? The boat you were on perhaps?
I hear that the paper this time round was harder compared with the previous diets. Anyone care to share their thoughts on this?
william - 07 Jun 2006, 12:19 pm
what do you mean by rocking?
Actually I took it today and I do have the feeling. I have only done about 85 percent of the paper. And the answer looks a little bit strange. I don't know why.
Any body took it today? How you feel?
chazza - 07 Jun 2006, 02:13 pm
I took this paper today - I thought it was very hard, a good deal harder that the last 5 papers which I used as practice. I thought that each question had something a bit nasty in it.
I would very much like other peoples views.
Onango - 07 Jun 2006, 08:07 pm
It wasn't an easy paper. :(
I did it complete without missing any part of the questions (thank god).
And i am hopeful to pass easily (may not score more than 65 :x ).
What about you guyz?
Deee - 09 Jun 2006, 06:21 am
Hi,
I felt really confident before the exam. All my practise on past exam papers had flowed, it just came to a complete halt iin the exam.
It was not what I was expecting..... or anyone else I've spoken to. Not one of them managed to finish it!
What do you do with a disposal that makes the general pool a negitive?? We did not cover it and I can't find it in the text books.
There were no nice questions on that paper!!
Oh well, just wait and see now. :cry:
Womble - 13 Jun 2006, 07:04 am
Yes I was shocked that a negative amount showed up in the general pool.
At least I was not the only one.
I treated it as a balancing allowance.
That really put me under pressure when I came across that question.
The VAT annual accounting question was a bit unexpected too. I covered every other area in VAT apart from annual accounting.......oh well
julie - 14 Jun 2006, 03:37 pm
I treated the negative pool with a balancing allowance as well, I hope its right!!
Overall though I had a pretty good feeling about 2.3. A bit worried now though, that everyone else seems not to have liked it.
I have just read the posts about 2.4 and everyone thought that paper was easy and I thought it was really hard!!
I don't know what that says about me!
Latoya - 14 Jun 2006, 07:14 pm
Hi Everyone,
I think the 2.1 paper was a good exam, even though some people I spoke with did not realise that the number 2 question was about Invitation to Tender.
The 2.3 paper on the other hand was more difficult, it made me very confused for most of the exam. The IBA made me think very hard. I did not even finish the paper.
I hope you guys pass, wish you all the best!
rluitel - 14 Jun 2006, 09:41 pm
i even don't think that the Question no 2 for the paper 2.1 was from Invitation to Tender. :roll:
loverfellow - 15 Jun 2006, 07:06 am
Well, I think paper 2.3 was easy, if someone has really care about the ftc tips. It was damn right. The only thing make me trouble was the selection of the last question. Question 2 was a gift and question 1 was also a bit easy. Question 2 in the previous sittings was a nightmare.I hope for 70 plus even I have completed 94 percent.
For paper 2.1, I completed it in the last sitting. The first question was out of order but section B was a bit easy and I got 64.
rluitel - 15 Jun 2006, 10:24 pm
2.3 it was easy paper for me compratively to rest 2.1 and 2.2.
it tooks 1hr to finished Question No 1 but QN 2 took lesst then half hour.
From the selection i left VAT and Taxplanning(may be), rest 3 questions i did fine.
i attemed 100marks and there was 15 min remaining at last...
rluitel - 23 Aug 2006, 02:36 am
i got 86marks
nathalia - 24 Aug 2006, 01:59 am
congrats!!