QUOTE:
yea sure email me :-)

QUOTE:
Hi Lilian

Can u pls mail me also the notes on paper 3.3. My mail id -
adimango@yahoo.co.in

Thanks in advance.

QUOTE:
Dear Friend,

At the outset, I would advocate you simply to re-assess your position in terms to availability to time factor, prior knowledge of the captioned subjects, assistance at your disposal i.e. tuition provider, friends etc. before to deeply set your self towards giving an exam attempt for the same.

Further, please treat my contents of this reply WITHOUT-PREJUDICE.

As I have walked through the said subjects and have cleared all except paper 3.3 where, I fell short of 4 marks in my last attempt i.e. 2006.



PAPER 2.5
To my experience, paper 2.5 took most of my resources in terms of time and practice. Although, the paper appears to be simple but comprises and is built upon most technical aspects e.g. IAS, which structures the whole scenario, whether problems/theory based. You need to practice the subject. Sharply...by that, I mean that you should not be caught in the wrong web as the questions spells different interpretation in term of its requirement and allocating judgments.

In brief, you should understand in first instant, what is talked about and what is expected of you in your answer.
Remember, it’s your understanding at the first instance as "There is no second winner in a war”. Exam is like a war, and be won...if you cannot solve the whole paper confidently, you may have to attempt the same-as that of fighting the war with one hand-the chances of winning proportionately drops instantly. I say this based on my experience as I failed to complete the 3.3 paper and fell short of 4 marks although I knew the answers...I seriously lacked practice and too that issues lightly. And had to pay the price.


PAPER 2.6
This paper is also no magic, assumed by most - to be easy and a type of essay writing sort of, are badly hit by the technical aspects needed to be mentioned/described/explain based on a much practical approach rather than producing stuff in black & white as that of the text. So, make sure, you blend your experience and showcase the practical approach to the same.

PAPER 3.3
This is the paper I failed by 4 marks. So, what went wrong? I did figure it out. As mentioned earlier, lack of practice of solving problems with pen and paper...disappointed me withy no great surprise-as I knew that having left problems unsolved due to lack of practice (especially when you take such exams after 14 years of your graduation) when you hardly write or practice writing becomes difficult. But I have learned by a bitter experience.... PRACTICE! PRACTICE! As much as possible in paper 3.3 as in 2.5 by writing it out.

PPAER 3.4

This paper is generally taken to grant and after having attempted, one expects over 60-70 marks since we have had written the paper well...its what I too believed in the same folly. I scored 50 when I expected over65 marks.
I analyzed the case and concluded that may be I must have had failed to produce the answers in a more professional way as at part 3.its your synthesis skills matter prominence.

Last but not the least. KEEP FAITH IN GOD AND HAVE UTTER CONFIDENCE THAT YOU WILL PASS.

Finally,

LIFE'S BATTLE DON; T ALWAYS GO TO STRONGER OR FASTER MAN,
BUT SOONER OR LATER,
THE MAN WHO WINS,
IS THE MAN WHO THINKS HE CAN!




Should you have any query or need further assistance on the subject, please do no hesitate o revert back to me.
Best regards
Jkjiwani



Thanks for the info. i doing 4 papers. currently not yet do rev kit.





P